The problem deserves loyalty.
The first idea does not.
One of the hardest things about building is separating the problem from the solution you became emotionally attached to.
When I first started thinking about student guidance, I believed mentorship was the answer. Then information. Then summaries. Then tools. Then AI-assisted guidance.
Each version made sense at the time. And each version became less important when reality showed me something deeper.
I used to think changing the model meant losing direction. Now I think the opposite. You can stay deeply committed to the question while being completely willing to change the answer.
That is not inconsistency. That is learning.